MAT102 Test 3 Prep
- Readings 7: MAT102 Field Axioms
- Be able to define a field.
- A field is a set of elements in which we can have a(n):
- additive
- identity
- inverse
- multiplicative
- identity
- inverse
- closure under addition and multiplication (can't escape the field if we add two or multiply two numbers from this field)
- commutative
- associative
- Note: commutativity and associativity comes from being a
. So these are almost always included.
- additive
- A field is a set of elements in which we can have a(n):
- Prove simple results about abstract fields.
- Identify when
is a field, and be able to explain why these values of n either succeed or fail at producing a field. is a field is prime.
- Be able to define a field.
- Readings 8: MAT102 Prep 8
- Explain how mathematical induction works and what it is designed to prove.
- Prove basic statements by using mathematical induction.
- Expand a sum or product from sigma/pi-notation to an explicit finite sum/product and vice versa.
- Prove basic summation/product formulas using induction.
- Readings 9: MAT102 Prep 9
- Explain the difference between strong and regular induction. Use strong induction to do elementary proofs.
- Explain what it means for something to be defined recursively.
- Use (structural) induction to prove properties of recursively defined elements.
Test 3 Example
- 1
- Let
denote a field on elements, and denote the multiplicative identity in . - 1
- Show that
- If
- This means that we can add in the multiplicative identity of the field
here. - Let
- If we have
, which is our multiplicative identity - If the above is true, then this means that at
- Only if this is true, can
. - Or
- let
- so
- The above is only true if the first, second and third, fourth elements are additive inverses of each other.
- If
- If we have
- Let
- so
- This then makes sense, if we have
is true.
- If we have
- Show that
- 2
- Show that at least one of
and must equal . - If we let
and have , this means that , which wouldn't work. - So we have to try the other one.
- We know that to have two multiplicative inverses
, that for some and should be additive inverses of each other. - Such as
- Show that at least one of
- Let
- 2
- Let
be general sets for - Define
- Show that
- Base Case:
- Which is
- Now let's show that
- Base case is true
- Induction Hypothesis:
- For
- Assume that
- For
- Induction Step:
- Show that
- We can re-express the right by taking out the
th term - The left side is:
- The right side is:
- Left:
- Right:
- Now we know via the properties of sets. We know that
- So the left side is:
- Show that
(Rewriting the union) (Distributive property: A ∩ (B ∪ C) = (A ∩ B) ∪ (A ∩ C)) (Induction Hypothesis) (Combining into a single union)
- Show that
- Let
- 3
- 1
- Show that for any positive integer
- This is true
- Show that for any positive integer
- 2
- Assume that
is a positive integer, show that and
- Assume that
- 3
- Show that for all
we have - Base Case:
- True
- Induction Hypothesis:
- Show that
- Show that
- Induction Step:
- Re express right side
- Show that for all
- 1
Worksheet 7 Practice
Question 1
Question
Consider the set
- a: Show that
is closed under addition and multiplication. If , then and - Addition
- To show it's closed under addition, I must show that
means that - We have been told that addition is as if it was in
. - So
- Let's re-express some variables to show this matches the definition of what it means to be in
- let
- let
- So we have
- Adding two
results in a , so we know that . - So this is closed under addition
- To show it's closed under addition, I must show that
- Multiplication
- To show it's closed under multiplication, we must show that
by showing that it still matches the definition of what it means to even be in - Let
and let - We know from the definition that these multiply like
numbers. - Let
- Let
- Adding and multiplying
will result in . - So we have
- So multiplication is closed in this field.
- To show it's closed under multiplication, we must show that
- Addition
- b: Show that
is a field. - Since
, we inherit the axioms regarding commutativity and associativity. - These don't need to be argued.
- We have show in part a, that
is closed under and . - So these have been proven.
- Now we need to show that
has a(n): - Additive Inverse
- Additive Identity
- Multiplicative Inverse
- Multiplicative Identity
- Additive Inverse
- This means that
- Let
- Let's prove this.
- This has been proven.
- This means that
- Additive Identity
- The additive identity goes like:
- This means that adding the 'additive identity' from the field, results in adding essentially nothing. Not changing the statement.
- Let
- From the additive inverse portion, we know that these cancel.
- So thus the additive identity is
. Meaning if we add to anything, we should get back our original statement. Meaning nothing changes.
- The additive identity goes like:
- Multiplicative Inverse
- This goes like
. - Example:
is true, for .
- Let's show this for
- Let
- So we need to find some
that - Let
- This means that:
- Now let's show that the right side of the equation is in
- Let
and - So we have
- So thus we know that this can be in
. But what about the denominator? needs to be - This is in
so thus this has been proven. - We know that
. The question tells us that it multiplies and adds like , multiplication is simply the of division essentially. - So everything is in
so there is a multiplicative inverse
- This goes like
- Multiplicative Identity
- This goes like:
- Example in the
: , in the is . - This is true
- Let's show this for
- Let
- Let's change the variable name from
to and let - The only way for this to happen is if
or if , which works since . We can express them as so: - So
- If we expand…
- So we do have a multiplicative identity
- This goes like:
- Thus we have proven all field axioms for
, so is a field.
- Since
Question 2
Question
The Euler totient function is a function which assigns to a positive integer
- a
- b
- If
is prime, then - This is because a prime number has no factors other than
and . - So thus, every number from
is coprime to .
- If
- c
- if
is prime and , determine - We know that if
is prime then - When we do
it automatically violates the definition of a prime. Because now we have factors other than .
- if
- d
- If
are such that is a positive integer and then - 1
- When
is prime, Euler's Totient Theorem is equivalent to Fermat's Little Theorem. - We know that FLT is
- If
is prime, this means the result of - So this just is the same thing.
- When
- 2
- Let
denote the numbers less than or equal to which are coprime to . Show that no two of these numbers lies in the same equivalence class module .
- Let
- If
Worksheet 8 Practice
Question 1
Question
- The fibonacci sequence is defined as
. - For
,
- b
- Base Case:
- This is true, because
- Induction Hypothesis:
- For some arbitrary
,
- For some arbitrary
- Induction Step:
- We know that we can pull out the last term in a sum.
- I see the induction hypothesis, which we assume was true
- So this is proven
- c
- Show that
- Base Case:
- By definition
- So this is true
- Induction Hypothesis:
- Assume for some
that
- Assume for some
- Induction Step:
- Let's show this
- Pull out the last term
- I see the induction hypothesis
- Show that
Assignment 4
- a: Show that for any integer
, - Base Case:
- True
- Induction Hypothesis:
- Assume for some
that
- Assume for some
- Induction Step:
- Show that
is true - Via IH
- Let's show that
- Show that
Test 3 Multiple Choice Practice
- 1
- Let
be a field with addition and multiplication. If , which is not a field axiom? - d
- Let
- 2
- e
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Prove that any postage of
or greater can be formed by using and stamps ( stamps). - Base Cases:
- Notice that the amount of
stamps go from , whereas the stamps go from . - We can see the same pattern here as how they increase and decrease.
- Induction Hypothesis:
- Assume that for some
that can be expressed as a sum of and stamps.
- Assume that for some
- Induction Step:
- Assume
- We can have
- To re-express this as a base case.
By IH
- Assume
- Prove that any postage of
- field
for some - let
for some - Closed adiditon multipociation
- Additive inverse, identity and multipoicate
- multiplicative inverse
Test 3 Practice Again
Question 2
- Base Case:
- By common sense and definition
- Equal
- Induction Hypothesis:
- Assume what's written
- Induction Step:
- WTS that
- Left side:
- Right side:
- Thus i am right
- if
then it must be both and
- WTS that
Other
WTS
I am right